What does targeting mean when it is described as effects-based?

What does targeting mean when it is described as effects-based?

• A. Aims to create specific outcomes through lethal and nonlethal actions.
• B. Focuses on achieving only kinetic destruction with no consideration of broader effects.
• C. Relies on chance rather than a rational objective.
• D. Emphasizes rapid withdrawal over achieving objectives.

Answer: (A)

Effects-based targeting is about producing specific, intended outcomes by shaping conditions across the adversary’s system, using a mix of lethal and nonlethal actions to influence behavior and capabilities. The goal is to create defined effects that support a desired end-state, not merely to destroy equipment or force, and it requires considering broader consequences and how different actions interact across domains. That’s why describing targeting as aiming to create specific outcomes through both lethal and nonlethal means best captures this approach. The other descriptions imply a narrow focus on destruction, rely on chance, or emphasize withdrawal, which miss the emphasis on achieving concrete, planned effects through integrated actions.

Effects-based targeting is about producing specific, intended outcomes by shaping conditions across the adversary’s system, using a mix of lethal and nonlethal actions to influence behavior and capabilities. The goal is to create defined effects that support a desired end-state, not merely to destroy equipment or force, and it requires considering broader consequences and how different actions interact across domains. That’s why describing targeting as aiming to create specific outcomes through both lethal and nonlethal means best captures this approach. The other descriptions imply a narrow focus on destruction, rely on chance, or emphasize withdrawal, which miss the emphasis on achieving concrete, planned effects through integrated actions.