How does proactive counterfire differ from reactive counterfire?

How does proactive counterfire differ from reactive counterfire?

• A. Proactive counterfire targets enemy indirect fire systems after they have fired.
• B. Reactive counterfire targets enemy indirect fire systems before they engage friendly forces.
• C. Proactive counterfire targets enemy indirect fire systems before they engage friendly forces.
• D. Proactive counterfire targets enemy air defenses.

Answer: (C)

Proactive counterfire is about striking enemy indirect-fire systems before they can engage friendly forces. It relies on solid intelligence, surveillance, and rapid target adjudication to preempt a threat, with the aim of denying, disrupting, or destroying the enemy’s ability to shoot. Reactive counterfire, by contrast, is a response to an indirect-fire event that has already begun—firing back to suppress or destroy the system after rounds have been launched. The statement correctly identifies proactive counterfire as targeting indirect-fire systems before they engage. The other options describe reacting after firing has started or targeting something unrelated like air defenses, which don’t capture the preemptive nature of proactive counterfire.

Proactive counterfire is about striking enemy indirect-fire systems before they can engage friendly forces. It relies on solid intelligence, surveillance, and rapid target adjudication to preempt a threat, with the aim of denying, disrupting, or destroying the enemy’s ability to shoot. Reactive counterfire, by contrast, is a response to an indirect-fire event that has already begun—firing back to suppress or destroy the system after rounds have been launched. The statement correctly identifies proactive counterfire as targeting indirect-fire systems before they engage. The other options describe reacting after firing has started or targeting something unrelated like air defenses, which don’t capture the preemptive nature of proactive counterfire.